Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision |
courses:cs335:spring2019:graffiti:smyrna [2019/04/26 19:33] โ [Use Cases] stalnakert | courses:cs335:spring2019:graffiti:smyrna [2019/04/26 19:35] โ [Relative Priority of Feature] stalnakert |
---|
====Use Cases==== | ====Use Cases==== |
| |
There really aren't any novel use cases associated with this feature. Essentially, we are just removing the maps of Herculaneum and Pompeii from the results page, if all of the results are from Smyrna. More generally we are only having the maps display, if graffiti from that region is present in the search results. This is being done to avoid confusing the user. All other features of the search should remain unchanged. Therefore, the use cases should also be the same. | There really aren't any novel use cases associated with this feature. Essentially, we are just removing the maps of Herculaneum and Pompeii from the results page, if all of the results are from Smyrna. More generally we are only having the maps display, if graffiti from that region are present in the search results. This is being done to avoid confusing the user. All other features of the search should remain unchanged. Therefore, the use cases should also be the same. |
| |
====Application Behavior==== | ====Application Behavior==== |
| |
On the results page, only maps that are relevant to the returned results will be shown to the user. When all inscriptions come from Smyrna, no maps will be visible. | On the results page, only maps that are relevant to the returned results will be shown to the user. When all inscriptions come from Smyrna or there are no results found, then no maps will be visible. |
====Relative Priority of Feature==== | ====Relative Priority of Feature==== |
| |
Low | Priority: Low |
| |
I wouldn't rank the priority of this feature very high. This is essentially an aesthetic change rather that a functional one. With this in mind, I would place our other features with a higher priority. So, of our 3 features, I would rank this one third and last. | I wouldn't rank the priority of this feature very high. This is essentially an aesthetic change rather that a functional one. Most of the functional components of this feature, such as accessing and storing Smyrna data in the database have already been accomplished. With this in mind, I would place our other features with a higher priority. So, of our 3 features, I would rank this one third and last. |