Let's suppose there is a matching in G consisting of k edges (xi,yi),…,(xik,yik)
Let's now consider the flow f that sends one unit along each path of the form s,xij,yij),t
=⇒ f(e) = 1 for each edge on one of these paths
Let's now consider the set M' of edges of the form (x,y) on which the flow value is 1:
M' contains k edges
Each node in X is the tail of at most one edge in M'
Each node in Y is the head of at most one edge in M'
The size of the maximum matching in G = value of the maximum flow in G', and edges in such a matching in G are the edges that carry flow from X to Y in G'
Bounding the running time: The Ford-Fulkerson Algorithm can be implemented to find a maximum matching in a bipartite graph in O(mn) time.
We need to find a way to convince one that there is no perfect matching in a certain graph. This “certificate” would allow us to convince someone that there is no perfect matching without having to trace the entire execution of the algorithm. To do so, we proceed as follows:
We decide if the graph G has a perfect Matching by checking if the maximum flow in a related graph G' has value at least n
By the Max-Flow Min-Cut Theorem, there will be an s-t cut of capacity less than n if the maximum-flow value in G' has value less than n
Thus in a way a cut with capacity less than n provides us with such certificate( that way of convincing someone there is no perfect matching in graph without having to trace out the entire algorithm.)
Let's consider a subset of nodes A⊆ X and let Γ(A) ⊆ Y be the set of all nodes that are adjacent to nodes in A:
If the graph has a perfect matching, then each node in A has to be matched to a different node in Γ(A)
Thus Γ(A) must be at least as large as A. Consequently:
Let us assume that the bipartite graph G = (V,E) has two sides in X and Y such that |X| = |Y|.
When I was in class, I didn't have a chance to follow the lecture as much as I was supposed to. Because I had missed out on the foundations of this section, I couldn't find myself as I had a really bad week and couldn't review the slides. But reading this section helps me a lot and puts me a bit back on track.
I give this section an 8/10